On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 08:37:32 AM Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 12/19/2017 12:38 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as > > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be > > reused for other domain numbers. > > > > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of > > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). > > > > struct riva_par has a pointer to struct pci_dev. Use the pci_dev member > > to extract the domain information. > > > > Change the function signature for CalcStateExt and RivaGetConfig to pass > > in struct pci_dev in addition to RIVA_HW_INST so that code inside the > > riva_hw.c can also calculate domain number and pass it to > > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Any feedback here, most of the remaining patches have the ACK except these? Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
