On 12/21, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> divider_recalc_rate() is an helper function used by clock divider of
> different types, so the structure containing the 'hw' pointer is not
> always a 'struct clk_divider'
>
> At the following line:
> > div = _get_div(table, val, flags, divider->width);
>
> in several cases, the value of 'divider->width' is garbage as the actual
> structure behind this memory is not a 'struct clk_divider'
>
> Fortunately, this width value is used by _get_val() only when
> CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO flag is set. This has never been the case so
> far when the structure is not a 'struct clk_divider'. This is probably
> why we did not notice this bug before
>
> Fixes: afe76c8fd030 ("clk: allow a clk divider with max divisor when zero")
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
