On 12/8/2017 8:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> static int ged_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_ged_device *geddev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>
>> + ged_cleanup_irq(geddev);
> Do you really need this duplication? You may as well call
> ged_shutdown() from here.
>
> And the local variable is redundant too.
>
> I guess it would be better to just fold ged_cleanup_irq() into
> ged_shutdown() and call that from ged_remove().
>
I originally tried to make these two APIs as common as possible and tried
calling shutdown from remove. However, the calling convention of shutdown
and remove are different.
Shutdown returns void; whereas, remove returns an integer. That's why, I
created a common function and called from both places.
I can probably make the calling parameter of ged_cleanup_irq() a pdev and
get rid of the additional casting in these two different functions.
Let me know if you have a better idea.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
