On 12/07, Loys Ollivier wrote: > > > On 07/12/2017 09:42, Jerome Forissier wrote: > > > > > > On 12/06/2017 09:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 12/06, Loys Ollivier wrote: > >>> When using other platform architectures, in the init of the qcom_scm > >>> driver, of_node_put is called on /firmware if no qcom dt is found. > >>> This results in a kernel error: Bad of_node_put() on /firmware. > >>> > >>> The call to of_node_put from the qcom_scm init is unnecessary as > >>> of_find_matching_node is calling it automatically. > >>> > >>> Remove this of_node_put(). > >>> > >>> Fixes: d0f6fa7ba2d6 ("firmware: qcom: scm: Convert SCM to platform driver") > >>> Signed-off-by: Loys Ollivier <lollivier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >> > >> This still looks wrong. Especially if of_find_matching_node() is > >> going to look for siblings of the /firmware node for the > >> compatible string for scm device. Why do we check at all? Can't > >> we just delete this and let of_platform_populate() take care of > >> it? BTW, OP-TEE driver seems to have a similar problem. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/29/230 > > > Well, the patch I sent is a fix for a specific bug I am encountering. > I tested the patch and it solves my problem. Stephen, your changes looks > good but it's a change in the driver's behavior. Maybe it could be > another patch ? Sure. But there's another of_node_put(fw_np) in this function, so why isn't that also removed? Assuming of_find_matching_node() is calling of_node_put() on what's passed in, then the node is going to get put twice in the "working" case. Andy? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html