Hi Sinan,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:04:49PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Now that we have a get_match_data() callback as part of the firmware node,
> implement the OF specific piece for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 264c355..9964169 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -981,6 +981,12 @@ static int of_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + struct device *dev)
static, as Rob mentioned.
> +{
> + return (void *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +}
> +
> const struct fwnode_operations of_fwnode_ops = {
> .get = of_fwnode_get,
> .put = of_fwnode_put,
> @@ -996,5 +1002,6 @@ static int of_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> .graph_get_remote_endpoint = of_fwnode_graph_get_remote_endpoint,
> .graph_get_port_parent = of_fwnode_graph_get_port_parent,
> .graph_parse_endpoint = of_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint,
> + .get_match_data = of_fwnode_get_match_data,
Please arrange right after device_is_available, the same applies to the
ACPI equivalent (5th patch).
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fwnode_ops);
With the above changes plus the ones in my comments on 3rd patch, on
patches 3--5:
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
