On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:05:51PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/4/2017 11:23 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Now that we have a get_match_data() callback as part of the firmware node,
> >> implement the OF specific piece for it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/of/property.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >>
> ..
>
> >>
> >> +void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> >> + const struct device_driver *drv)
> >> +{
> >> + const struct device_node *node = to_of_node(fwnode);
> >> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> >> +
> >> + if (!node)
> >> + return NULL;
> >
> > of_match_node checks this.
>
> I see a check for the matches argument but not for the node argument.
> Am I missing something?
Ah yes, you are right.
>
> >
> >> +
> >> + match = of_match_node(drv->of_match_table, node);
> >> + if (!match)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + return (void *)match->data;
> >
> > Don't need a cast here.
>
> I can fix this.
>
> >
> > of_device_get_match_data() already does most of this, but getting a
> > device ptr from fwnode_handle may not be possible?
>
> I couldn't figure out how to do that. Do you have a suggestion?
> I have been looking for examples with no luck.
Change the property API to pass struct device instead. That's maybe not
worth it.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
