On 11/8/2017 11:49 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 10:29 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> +#define HIDMA_MAX_DEV_MATCH 10
>> +
>> +struct hidma_cap {
>> + const struct of_device_id of[HIDMA_MAX_DEV_MATCH];
>> + const struct acpi_device_id acpi[HIDMA_MAX_DEV_MATCH];
>> +};
>
> This seems wrong. You're defining an array of size 10, but it only has three elements. And the third element is a sentinel, which is typically used to avoid specifying the size of the array.
>
It is true that I define an array of size 10. It is just some arbitrary number
with forward thinking. I don't really have to use it to the maximum today as long
as I satisfy the calling conventions.
What is important is that the of_device_match() and acpi_device_match() functions
will stop searching only if they find an empty element. The {} element.
That's the calling semantics of of_device_match() and acpi_device_match().
Besides, C compiler also won't let me put two arrays together like this.
struct my_struct {
struct some_struct array1[]
struct some_struct array2[]
}
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
