On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:09:29PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 11/6/2017 1:15 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > On 11/6/2017 1:03 PM, Robin Murphy wrote: > >>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > >>> ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062"); > >>> + if (ret) > >>> + ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8063"); > >> This string-juggling looks to have already hit the point at which it > >> doesn't scale well - it would be a lot nicer to make use of > >> of_device_get_match_data() and the ACPI equivalent to abstract the > >> version-specific data appropriately. > > > > Sure, let me do some research. > > > > I just wanted to double check here. > > This is what I can do: > 1. Maintain different match tables for different driver capabilities. > 2. Instead of doing open-coded strcmp, I can do match against different tables > using acpi_match_device/of_match_device. > > Hope this works for you. Sounds better to me. You should have common match where capabilities are same. -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
