On 10/25/2017 5:28 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: >> Previously, we only tried the next reset method if one method failed >> with -ENOTTY. With this patch, we'll try the next reset method if one >> method fails for any reason, not just -ENOTTY. > Hmm, I thought the return codes were pretty consistent. -ENOTTY means > that the reset callback doesn't handle the device, move on. Many > ioctls use the same return code to indicate an unknown ioctl. This > allows us to differentiate success vs error vs unhandled. In the code > below we lose the ability to, for instance, have a device specific > reset that returns -EINVAL to prevent the PCI core for triggering > further reset mechanisms which might be broken on the device. So, I > don't see that this patch specifically fixes anything, but it does > remove what seems like useful functionality... I'd veto it. Thanks, > OK, It was not obvious how the EINVAL and ENOTTY used by code inspection. Thank your very much for the clarification. I'm dropping the patch unless Bjorn has another idea. > Alex > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
