On Mon 11 Sep 17:32 PDT 2017, fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> GPIO is expected to be disabled iff PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE is
> configured. Update is_enabled flag in config_set() so that it can
> reflect GPIO status correctly. Also modify EN_CTL register based on
> is_enabled flag in config_set() to configure the GPIO properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> index c2c0bab..a0edaa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static int pmic_gpio_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
>
> pad = pctldev->desc->pins[pin].drv_data;
>
> + pad->is_enabled = true;
> for (i = 0; i < nconfs; i++) {
> param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
> arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
> @@ -600,6 +601,10 @@ static int pmic_gpio_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + val = pad->is_enabled << PMIC_GPIO_REG_MASTER_EN_SHIFT;
> +
> + ret = pmic_gpio_write(state, pad, PMIC_GPIO_REG_EN_CTL, val);
> +
This looks good.
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
But I spotted another issue while reviewing this; currently the initial
state of is_enabled is unconditionally set to enabled in
pmic_gpio_populate(), so reading the initial pinconf or configuring a
pinmux before setting a pinconf will operate on the potentially wrong
information.
So I think the initial value should be read out from REG_EN_CTL rather
than being just "true".
Can you please either submit another patch for this?
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
