On 9/21/17 7:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
I guess gpio_valid_mask would take precedence over irq_valid_mask. I.e if the GPIO is not valid then the IRQ is per definition not valid either. Since it is a new thing, we can simply define a semantic like that and document it.
So what about my current patches? I hope you're not asking me to rewrite them again.
-- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
