Re: [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: fix issue with power irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/24/2017 1:10 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 18/08/17 08:19, Vijay Viswanath wrote:
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

SDCC controller reset (SW_RST) during probe may trigger power irq if
previous status of PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before we
enable the power irq interrupt in GIC (by registering the interrupt
handler), we need to ensure that any pending power irq interrupt status
is acknowledged otherwise power irq interrupt handler would be fired
prematurely.

Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index 9d601dc..0957199 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -1128,6 +1128,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	u16 host_version, core_minor;
  	u32 core_version, config;
  	u8 core_major;
+	u32 irq_status, irq_ctl;
host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_msm_pdata, sizeof(*msm_host));
  	if (IS_ERR(host))
@@ -1250,6 +1251,28 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  			       CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_CAPABILITIES0);
  	}
+ /*
+	 * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of
+	 * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq
+	 * interrupt in GIC, any pending power irq interrupt should be
+	 * acknowledged. Otherwise power irq interrupt handler would be
+	 * fired prematurely.
+	 */
+
+	irq_status = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS);
+	writel_relaxed(irq_status, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CLEAR);
+	irq_ctl = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);
+	if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON | CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF))
+		irq_ctl |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
+	if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH | CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW))
+		irq_ctl |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS;
+	writel_relaxed(irq_ctl,	msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);

This looks a lot like sdhci_msm_voltage_switch().  Can clearing the
interrupt be a common function?

This is better. Will change the patches to do it this way.
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that above writes are propogated before interrupt enablement
+	 * in GIC.
+	 */
+	mb();
+
  	/* Setup IRQ for handling power/voltage tasks with PMIC */
  	msm_host->pwr_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pwr_irq");
  	if (msm_host->pwr_irq < 0) {
@@ -1259,6 +1282,9 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		goto clk_disable;
  	}
+ /* Enable pwr irq interrupts */
+	writel_relaxed(INT_MASK, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_MASK);
+
  	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, msm_host->pwr_irq, NULL,
  					sdhci_msm_pwr_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
  					dev_name(&pdev->dev), host);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux