On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:18:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 08/18/2017 08:28 AM, Kiran Gunda wrote: > > The peripheral ownership check is not necessary on single master > > platforms. Hence, enforce the peripheral ownership check optionally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > This sounds like a band-aid. Isn't the gpio driver going to keep probing > all the pins that are not supposed to be accessed due to security > constraints? What exactly is failing in the gpio case? > > Also, I thought we were getting rid of the ownership checks? Or at > least, putting them behind some debug kernel feature check or something? I'm wondering that too. Since we have the following patch to remove the check on read/write access anyway, why are we adding the check in .xlate hook? spmi: pmic-arb: remove the read/write access checks Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
