On 06/23, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 20/06/17 01:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >On 06/12, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >>This patch adds missing LPASS smmu clks which are required by the audio driver.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8996.h | 2 ++
> >> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c
> >>index 56e0a295c74e..6290ce551505 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c
> >>@@ -2644,6 +2644,30 @@ static struct clk_fixed_factor ufs_rx_cfg_clk_src = {
> >> },
> >> };
> >>+static struct clk_branch gcc_hlos1_vote_lpass_core_smmu_clk = {
> >>+ .halt_reg = 0x7d010,
> >
> >Don't we need .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_VOTED for these?
> >
> I don't think we need it for these clks, Downstream driver has
> no_halt_check_on_disable = true for both these clks.
>
>
Right, no_halt_check_on_disable means we don't check the halt bit
when disabling the clk, but we _do_ check the halt bit when
enabling. In upstream clk driver that would be indicated with
BRANCH_HALT_VOTED, where we check the halt bit when enabling and
it's voted and do a small udelay() if we're disabling and it's
voted. I suppose that small udelay() could be removed because it
doesn't really matter that it turns off or not when we're
disabling a voted clk.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
