Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] reset: hide reset control arrays behind struct reset_control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vivek,

On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 12:16 +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -102,18 +94,6 @@ static inline struct reset_control *__devm_reset_control_get(
> >   	return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
> >   }
> >   
> > -static inline
> > -int reset_control_array_assert(struct reset_control_array *resets)
> > -{
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline
> > -int reset_control_array_deassert(struct reset_control_array *resets)
> > -{
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >   static inline struct reset_control_array *
> 
> This has to return just 'struct reset_control *'.
> That should resolve kbuild errors.
>
> Rest looks good to me.
> Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, I had already fixed this locally, prompted by the kbuild test
robot. I'll send a v6. I would like to merge this patch into the first
"reset: Add APIs to manage array of resets" patch, if that's ok with
you.

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux