On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote: > Currently the SPMI interrupt will not wake the device. Enable this > interrupt as a wakeup source. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Troast <ntroast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > index 0deac33..2afe359 100644 > --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c > @@ -1140,6 +1140,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(pa->irq, pmic_arb_chained_irq, pa); > + enable_irq_wake(pa->irq); Why don't we do this through an irq_set_wake callback in the irqchip? That way, we don't mark this irq as wakeup if any child irqs aren't marked as wakeup. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
