On 05/25, Rob Clark wrote:
> + apps_iommu: iommu@1ef0000 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + #iommu-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-iommu", "qcom,msm-iommu-v1";
> + ranges = <0 0x1e20000 0x40000>;
> + reg = <0x1ef0000 0x3000>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SMMU_CFG_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_APSS_TCU_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "iface", "bus";
> + qcom,iommu-secure-id = <17>;
> +
> + // mdp_0:
> + iommu-ctx@4000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-ns";
> + reg = <0x4000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 0>;
s/0/IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH/
> + };
> +
> + // venus_ns:
> + iommu-ctx@5000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-sec";
> + reg = <0x5000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 0>;
s/0/IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH/
Is it the same interrupt number (70) twice? Not 71 or something?
> + };
> + };
> +
> + gpu_iommu: iommu@1f08000 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + #iommu-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-iommu", "qcom,msm-iommu-v1";
> + ranges = <0 0x1f08000 0x10000>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SMMU_CFG_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_GFX_TCU_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "iface", "bus";
> + qcom,iommu-secure-id = <18>;
> +
> + // gfx3d_user:
> + iommu-ctx@1000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-ns";
> + reg = <0x1000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 241 0>;
s/0/IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH/
> + };
> +
> + // gfx3d_priv:
> + iommu-ctx@2000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm-iommu-v1-ns";
> + reg = <0x2000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 242 0>;
s/0/IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH/
> + };
> + };
> +
> gpu_opp_table: opp_table {
> compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
