Hi Laurent,
On 2017-05-16 12:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sricharan,
On Tuesday 16 May 2017 07:53:57 sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2017-05-16 03:04, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 15 May 2017 23:37:16 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> On Wednesday 03 May 2017 15:54:59 Sricharan R wrote:
>>> On 5/3/2017 3:24 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>> On 02/05/17 19:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>>>> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Failures to look up an IOMMU when parsing the DT iommus property
>>>>>> need to be handled separately from the .of_xlate() failures to
>>>>>> support deferred probing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The lack of a registered IOMMU can be caused by the lack of a driver
>>>>>> for the IOMMU, the IOMMU device probe not having been performed yet,
>>>>>> having been deferred, or having failed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first case occurs when the device tree describes the bus master
>>>>>> and IOMMU topology correctly but no device driver exists for the
>>>>>> IOMMU yet or the device driver has not been compiled in. Return NULL,
>>>>>> the caller will configure the device without an IOMMU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The second and third cases are handled by deferring the probe of the
>>>>>> bus master device which will eventually get reprobed after the
>>>>>> IOMMU.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The last case is currently handled by deferring the probe of the bus
>>>>>> master device as well. A mechanism to either configure the bus
>>>>>> master device without an IOMMU or to fail the bus master device probe
>>>>>> depending on whether the IOMMU is optional or mandatory would be a
>>>>>> good enhancement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pichart
>>>>>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch broke Renesas R-Car Gen3 platforms in renesas-drivers.
>>>>> As the IOMMU nodes in DT are not yet enabled, all devices having
>>>>> iommus properties in DT now fail to probe.
>>>>
>>>> How exactly do they fail to probe? Per d7b0558230e4, if there are no
>>>> ops registered then they should merely defer until we reach the point
>>>> of giving up and ignoring the IOMMU. Is it just that you have no other
>>>> late-probing drivers or post-init module loads to kick the deferred
>>>> queue after that point? I did try to find a way to explicitly kick it
>>>> from a suitably late initcall, but there didn't seem to be any obvious
>>>> public interface - anyone have any suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> I think that's more of a general problem with the probe deferral
>>>> mechanism itself (I've seen the same thing happen with some of the
>>>> CoreSight stuff on Juno due to the number of inter-component
>>>> dependencies) rather than any specific fault of this series.
>>>
>>> I was thinking of an additional check like below to avoid the
>>> situation ?
>>>
>>> From 499b6e662f60f23740b8880882b0a16f16434501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 13:16:59 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER
>>>
>>> While returning EPROBE_DEFER for iommu masters
>>> take in to account of iommu nodes that could be
>>> marked in DT as 'status=disabled', in which case
>>> simply return NULL and let the master's probe
>>> continue rather than deferring.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>> index 9f44ee8..e6e9bec 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static bool of_iommu_driver_present(struct
>>> device_node *np)
>>>
>>> ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwnode);
>>> if ((ops && !ops->of_xlate) ||
>>> + !of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np) ||
>>> (!ops && !of_iommu_driver_present(iommu_spec->np)))
>>> return NULL;
>>
>> This looks good to me, but won't be enough. The ipmmu-vmsa driver in
>> v4.12-rc1 doesn't call iommu_device_register() and thus won't be found
>> by iommu_ops_from_fwnode(). Furthermore, it doesn't IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(),
>> and thus will always be considered as absent.
>>
>> I agree that the ipmmu-vmsa driver needs to be fixed, but it would
>> have been nice to check existing IOMMU drivers before merging this patch
>> series...
>
> Please pardon the question, but has this patch series been tested on
> ARM32 ?
>
> When the device is probed the arch_setup_dma_ops() function is called.
> It sets the device's dma_ops and the mapping (in
> __arm_iommu_attach_device()). If probe is deferred,
> arch_teardown_dma_ops() is called which in turn calls
> arch_teardown_dma_ops(). This removes the mapping but doesn't touch the
> dma_ops. The next time the device is probed, arch_setup_dma_ops() bails
> out immediately as the dma_ops are already set, leaving us with a device
> bound to IOMMU operations but with no mapping. This oopses later as soon
> as the kernel tries to map memory for the device through the IOMMU.
Resetting the dma_ops for arm32 was added in this patch [1], which I
missed to send in the original series, but now have added to Russell's
patch
tracking system.
Thank you. I fear that won't be enough though.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9434105/
Quoting the patch:
arch_teardown_dma_ops() being the inverse of arch_setup_dma_ops()
,dma_ops should be cleared in the teardown path. Otherwise
this causes problem when the probe of device is retried after
being deferred. The device's iommu structures are cleared
after EPROBEDEFER error, but on the next try dma_ops will still
be set to old value, which is not right.
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index ab4f745..a40f03e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -2358,6 +2358,7 @@ static void arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(struct
device
*dev)
__arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
arm_iommu_release_mapping(mapping);
+ set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
}
#else
The subject mentions arch_teardown_dma_ops(), which I think is correct,
but
the patch adds the set_dma_ops() call to arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops().
However, the situation is perhaps more complex. Note the check at the
beginning of arch_setup_dma_ops():
/*
* Don't override the dma_ops if they have already been set. Ideally
* this should be the only location where dma_ops are set, remove this
* check when all other callers of set_dma_ops will have disappeared.
*/
if (dev->dma_ops)
return;
If you set the dma_ops to NULL in arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops() or
arch_teardown_dma_ops(), the next call to arch_setup_dma_ops() will
override
them. To be safe you should only set them to NULL if they have been set
by
arch_setup_dma_ops(). More than that, arch_teardown_dma_ops() should
probably
not call arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops() at all if the dma_ops were set by
arm_iommu_attach_device() and not arch_teardown_dma_ops(). One option
would be
to add a field to struct dev_archdata to store that information. To
avoid
growing the structure, which is embedded in every struct device, you
could
possibly turn the dma_coherent bool into a bitfield.
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ struct dev_archdata {
#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
const struct dma_map_ops *dev_dma_ops;
#endif
- bool dma_coherent;
+ bool dma_coherent:1;
+ bool dma_ops_setup:1;
};
struct omap_device;
I haven't checked, however, whether the dma_coherent field would need
to be
accessed atomically, so this might be a bad idea.
Last but not least, a fix must be merged in v4.12, and the sooner the
better.
ho, yet another combination. This seems to be a problem with
exynos_iommu,
ipmmu-vmsa, mtk_iommu_v1 which calls the arm_iommu_attach_device with
its
own custom mapping. They are calling arm_iommu_attach_device from the
add_device callback and that is not always replayed when the reprobe
happens
and these archs are storing the old mapping data in private structures
which
might not be cleared in the teardown path. I will post the fix that you
have
suggested.
Regards,
Sricharan
> I might be missing something obvious, but I don't see how this can
> work.
>
>>>>> This can be fixed by either:
>>>>> - Disabling CONFIG_IPMMU_VMSA, or
>>>>> - Reverting commit 7b07cbefb68d486f (but keeping "int ret = 0;").
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that this was a bit hard to investigate, as R-Car Gen3 support
>>>>> wasn't upstreamed yet, so bisection pointed to a merge commit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
