Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Due to relaxed ordering requirements on multiple architectures, > drivers are required to use wmb/rmb/mb combinations when they need to > guarantee observability between the memory and the HW. > > The mpt3sas driver is already using wmb() for this purpose. However, > it issues a writel following wmb(). writel() function on arm/arm64 > arhictectures have an embedded wmb() call inside. > > This results in unnecessary performance loss and code duplication. > > writel already guarantees ordering for both cpu and bus. we don't need > additional wmb() Broadcom folks, please review! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
