On 04/04/17 11:18, Sricharan R wrote:
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
>
> The IOMMU probe deferral implementation requires a mechanism to detect
> if drivers for SMMU components are built-in in the kernel to detect
> whether IOMMU configuration for a given device should be deferred (ie
> SMMU drivers present but still not probed) or not (drivers not present).
>
> Add a simple function to IORT to detect if SMMU drivers for SMMU
> components managed by IORT are built-in in the kernel.
Ah, if only DT could be this neat and tidy :D
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 4a5bb96..3dd9ec3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_iort_xlate(struct device *dev, u32 streamid,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static inline bool iort_iommu_driver_enabled(u8 type)
> +{
> + switch (type) {
> + case ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3:
> + return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3);
> + case ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU:
> + return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU);
> + default:
> + pr_warn("IORT node type %u does not describe an SMMU\n", type);
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_xlate(struct device *dev,
> struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> u32 streamid)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
