Why would a timeout for a message be expected? The BMC should
at least respond with an error for an incorrect message.
-corey
On 03/23/2017 10:32 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Getting timeout message from BMC when trying to read from a non-existent
FRU. This is expected but warning is not.
Let's reduce the warning to debug.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
index 747c2ba..1b64419 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
@@ -429,8 +429,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, void *user_msg_data)
if (msg->recv_type == IPMI_RESPONSE_RECV_TYPE &&
msg->msg.data_len == 1) {
if (msg->msg.data[0] == IPMI_TIMEOUT_COMPLETION_CODE) {
- dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, true,
- "Unexpected response (timeout).\n");
+ dev_dbg_once(dev, "Unexpected response (timeout).\n");
tx_msg->msg_done = ACPI_IPMI_TIMEOUT;
}
goto out_comp;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
