On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:45:04PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 20 Feb 14:00 PST 2017, Andy Gross wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:51:56AM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > > > Without this patch (and with CONFIG_QCOM_ADSP_PIL), I get this error: > > > > > > [ 0.711529] qcom_adsp_pil adsp-pil: failed to get xo clock > > > [ 0.711540] remoteproc remoteproc0: releasing adsp-pil > > > > > > With this patch, adsp-pil can initialize correctly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! > The ADSP is running off a clock derived from XO, as such a vote for XO > must be held while the ADSP is running. It's possible the all > application CPUs hit idle after launching the ADSP, but before the ADSP > firmware can communicate this need with the RPM, which would result in > the votes hitting 0 and the RPM might gate the XO. > > To prevent this the ADSP remoteproc driver must hold an extra vote with > the RPM until the ADSP signals that it has cast its vote. > > Unfortunately there are some issues with nested probe deferral in the > clock framework, so we can't accurately describe the XO today and as > we're still missing some last pieces of idle mechanism causing above > events we can survive by faking it and using xo_board - for a little > bit longer... Ok, that makes sense. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
