Re: [PATCH 00/11] drm/msm: A5XX preemption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 6 February 2017 at 17:59, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:39:28AM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> This initial series implements 4 ringbuffers to give sufficient coverage for the
>> range of priority levels requested by the GLES and compute extensions. The
>> targeted ringbuffer is specified in the command submission flags. The default
>> ring is 0 (lowest priority).
>
> Link to userspace part that implements these extensions? Also which
> gles/compute extensions are you talking about? Asking not just because of
> the open source userspace requirement, but also because we want to
> upstream a scheduler on the i915 side. Getting alignment on that across
> drm drivers would be sweet.

Assuming he meant EGL rather than GLES, this is the usual one:
https://www.khronos.org/registry/EGL/extensions/IMG/EGL_IMG_context_priority.txt

Cheers,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux