On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Suggested by Rob Herring. We still support the old names for
>> compatibility with downstream android dt files.
>>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Huh, I don't think I would have cleaned up DT bindings in exchange for
> adding driver code like this. But the code seems correct, so other than
> one optional suggestion:
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> +struct clk *msm_clk_get(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name)
>> +{
>> + struct clk *clk;
>> + char name2[32];
>> +
>> + clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, name);
>> + if (!IS_ERR(clk) || PTR_ERR(clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + return clk;
>> +
>> + snprintf(name2, sizeof(name2), "%s_clk", name);
>> +
>> + clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, name2);
>> + if (!IS_ERR(clk) || PTR_ERR(clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Using legacy clk name binding. Use "
>> + "\"%s\" instead of \"%s\"\n", name, name2);
>
> Drop the second "|| PTR_ERR(clk)" case, so that you only get one warning
> printed at boot if deferring happens?
oh, good point.. I've fixed that up locally. I don't think we'd
actually hit this case currently for gpu clks, since for gpu this
codepath happens on first open() of the device file. But I should
mention I have a slighly sneaky ulterior motive, which is that we
could use the same cleanup for display related clks (which do
currently upstream use the _clk suffix).
BR,
-R
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
