Hi Bjorn, >-----Original Message----- >From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 2:34 AM >To: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- >pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 07/11] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error > >On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:48:09PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Failures to look up an IOMMU when parsing the DT iommus property need to >> be handled separately from the .of_xlate() failures to support deferred >> probing. >> >> The lack of a registered IOMMU can be caused by the lack of a driver for >> the IOMMU, the IOMMU device probe not having been performed yet, having >> been deferred, or having failed. >> >> The first case occurs when the device tree describes the bus master and >> IOMMU topology correctly but no device driver exists for the IOMMU yet >> or the device driver has not been compiled in. Return NULL, the caller >> will configure the device without an IOMMU. >> >> The second and third cases are handled by deferring the probe of the bus >> master device which will eventually get reprobed after the IOMMU. >> >> The last case is currently handled by deferring the probe of the bus >> master device as well. A mechanism to either configure the bus master >> device without an IOMMU or to fail the bus master device probe depending >> on whether the IOMMU is optional or mandatory would be a good >> enhancement. >> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pichart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> ... > >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> index 349bd1d..9529d6c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ >> #include <linux/of.h> >> #include <linux/of_iommu.h> >> #include <linux/of_pci.h> >> +#include <linux/pci.h> > >Why do we need this? Right, will remove it. Regards, Sricharan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html