Re: [PATCH V7 01/11] iommu/of: Refactor of_iommu_configure() for error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tomasz,

On 25/01/17 17:17, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> Hi Sricharan,
> 
> On 23.01.2017 17:18, Sricharan R wrote:
>> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> In preparation for some upcoming cleverness, rework the control flow in
>> of_iommu_configure() to minimise duplication and improve the propogation
>> of errors. It's also as good a time as any to switch over from the
>> now-just-a-compatibility-wrapper of_iommu_get_ops() to using the generic
>> IOMMU instance interface directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 83
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>> index 0f57ddc..ee49081 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>> @@ -96,6 +96,28 @@ int of_get_dma_window(struct device_node *dn, const
>> char *prefix, int index,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_dma_window);
>>
>> +static const struct iommu_ops
>> +*of_iommu_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *iommu_spec)
>> +{
>> +    const struct iommu_ops *ops;
>> +    struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = &iommu_spec->np->fwnode;
>> +    int err;
>> +
>> +    ops = iommu_get_instance(fwnode);
>> +    if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    err = iommu_fwspec_init(dev, &iommu_spec->np->fwnode, ops);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        return ERR_PTR(err);
>> +
>> +    err = ops->of_xlate(dev, iommu_spec);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        return ERR_PTR(err);
>> +
>> +    return ops;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
>>  {
>>      struct of_phandle_args *iommu_spec = data;
>> @@ -105,10 +127,11 @@ static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> u16 alias, void *data)
>>  }
>>
>>  static const struct iommu_ops
>> -*of_pci_iommu_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device_node
>> *bridge_np)
>> +*of_pci_iommu_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct device_node *bridge_np)
>>  {
>>      const struct iommu_ops *ops;
>>      struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
>> +    int err;
>>
>>      /*
>>       * Start by tracing the RID alias down the PCI topology as
>> @@ -123,56 +146,56 @@ static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> u16 alias, void *data)
>>       * bus into the system beyond, and which IOMMU it ends up at.
>>       */
>>      iommu_spec.np = NULL;
>> -    if (of_pci_map_rid(bridge_np, iommu_spec.args[0], "iommu-map",
>> -               "iommu-map-mask", &iommu_spec.np, iommu_spec.args))
>> -        return NULL;
>> +    err = of_pci_map_rid(bridge_np, iommu_spec.args[0], "iommu-map",
>> +                 "iommu-map-mask", &iommu_spec.np,
>> +                 iommu_spec.args);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        return ERR_PTR(err);
>>
>> -    ops = of_iommu_get_ops(iommu_spec.np);
>> -    if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate ||
>> -        iommu_fwspec_init(&pdev->dev, &iommu_spec.np->fwnode, ops) ||
>> -        ops->of_xlate(&pdev->dev, &iommu_spec))
>> -        ops = NULL;
>> +    ops = of_iommu_xlate(&pdev->dev, &iommu_spec);
>>
>>      of_node_put(iommu_spec.np);
>>      return ops;
>>  }
>>
>> -const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>> -                       struct device_node *master_np)
>> +static const struct iommu_ops
>> +*of_platform_iommu_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>>      struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
>> -    struct device_node *np;
>>      const struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
>>      int idx = 0;
>>
>> -    if (dev_is_pci(dev))
>> -        return of_pci_iommu_configure(to_pci_dev(dev), master_np);
>> -
>>      /*
>>       * We don't currently walk up the tree looking for a parent IOMMU.
>>       * See the `Notes:' section of
>>       * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/iommu.txt
>>       */
>> -    while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(master_np, "iommus",
>> -                       "#iommu-cells", idx,
>> -                       &iommu_spec)) {
>> -        np = iommu_spec.np;
>> -        ops = of_iommu_get_ops(np);
>> -
>> -        if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate ||
>> -            iommu_fwspec_init(dev, &np->fwnode, ops) ||
>> -            ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec))
>> -            goto err_put_node;
>> -
>> -        of_node_put(np);
>> +    while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells",
>> +                       idx, &iommu_spec)) {
>> +        ops = of_iommu_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec);
>> +        of_node_put(iommu_spec.np);
>>          idx++;
>> +        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ops))
>> +            break;
>>      }
>>
>>      return ops;
>> +}
>> +
>> +const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>> +                       struct device_node *master_np)
>> +{
>> +    const struct iommu_ops *ops;
>> +
>> +    if (!master_np)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    if (dev_is_pci(dev))
>> +        ops = of_pci_iommu_init(to_pci_dev(dev), master_np);
> 
> I gave the whole patch set a try on ThunderX. really_probe() is failing
> on dma_configure()->of_pci_iommu_init() for each PCI device.

When you say "failing", do you mean cleanly, or with a crash? I've
managed to hit __of_match_node() dereferencing NULL from
of_iommu_xlate() in a horribly complicated chain of events, which I'm
trying to figure out now, and I wonder if the two might be related.

> of_pci_iommu_init() tries to setup firmware stuff via "iommu-map" but
> ThunderX is using legacy "mmu-masters" binding. We need to take care of
> that case too.

That is by design. The "mmu-masters" binding is ARM-SMMU-specific and
will continue to provide the same level of DMA ops support it always has
(for which there really are practical implementation reasons, it's not
just an arbitrary "encourage people to move to the generic bindings"
decision).

Robin.

>> +    else
>> +        ops = of_platform_iommu_init(dev, master_np);
>>
>> -err_put_node:
>> -    of_node_put(np);
>> -    return NULL;
>> +    return IS_ERR(ops) ? NULL : ops;
>>  }
>>
>>  static int __init of_iommu_init(void)
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux