Re: [RESEND PATCHv1 5/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: configure CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG to recommended value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stephen,

On 1/20/2017 11:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 01/09/2017 11:00 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Program CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG for hardware recommended 1.25ns delay.
We may see data CRC errors if it's programmed for any other delay
value.

Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index a028568..84d29dd 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_cdclp533_calibration(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	writel_relaxed(0x4, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_CAL_TIMER_CFG1);
 	writel_relaxed(0xCB732020, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_REFCOUNT_CFG);
 	writel_relaxed(0xB19, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_COARSE_CAL_CFG);
-	writel_relaxed(0x3AC, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG);
+	writel_relaxed(0x4E2, host->ioaddr + CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG);
 	writel_relaxed(0x0, host->ioaddr + CORE_CDC_OFFSET_CFG);
 	writel_relaxed(0x16334, host->ioaddr + CORE_CDC_SLAVE_DDA_CFG);


There's a comment block above this set of writes that repeats what's
happening in the code.

        /*
         * Perform CDC Register Initialization Sequence
         *
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_CTLR_CFG0       0x11800EC
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_CTLR_CFG1       0x3011111
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_CAL_TIMER_CFG0  0x1201000
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_CAL_TIMER_CFG1  0x4
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_REFCOUNT_CFG    0xCB732020
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_COARSE_CAL_CFG  0xB19
         * CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG       0x3AC
         * CORE_CDC_OFFSET_CFG          0x0
         * CORE_CDC_SLAVE_DDA_CFG       0x16334
         */

Perhaps we should just delete those comments because they're incorrect now.

Thanks for the review. Yes, I have addressed this comment on top of this series along with one other fix.
-named ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Addresses minor cleanups")

Regards
Ritesh

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux