Hey Brian-
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:38:33PM -0500, Brian Wrenn wrote:
> Has anyone else encountered this kernel crash? It happens during a
> benchmark we have made with the following error message:
>
> [ 3395.840390] kernel BUG at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1014!
> [ 3395.840396] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>
> I've attached a capture of the stack trace.
>
> For some background, here's our setup.
> (0) The Variscite DART SD410 SOM
> (1) Linaro 4.4.9 patched to PREEMPT RT with patch-4.4.9-rt17.patch.gz
> (2) We are running a modified spidev driver: basically the spidev
> driver from the standard kernel tree plus an interrupt registered on a
> input GPIO pin that performs a SPI transfer very similarly to the way
> the spidev_test user space application does, or at least the kernel
> routines spidev_test invokes when run. It also toggles an output GPIO
> pin high at the beginning of the interrupt handler and then low before
> the interrupt handler exits. We're transferring over the SPI at
> 50MHz.
> (3) iperf running at 10 Mbytes/sec over Wi-Fi
> (4) a benchmarking utility that simulates FFT operations, which
> persistently keeps the processor running at or near 100% CPU
> (5) Only the kernel runs in real time. The FFT and iperf run in user
> space and for our purposes can tolerate delay. Only our modified
> spidev must run in real time.
>
> We are indeed heavily loading the SOM, but we anticipate such to
> happen when the system we want to build runs at its expected peak. If
> anyone has some thoughts about whether...
> (a) anyone has encountered this bug before,
> (b) we have uncovered a bug,
> (c) we may have a faulty approach at some level, or
> (d) we expect too much from this SOM, we'd appreciate any input.
>
> Thanks for any help,
Looking at the log you've reported, it looks like while the crash seems
to finger rtmutex.c, it's actually the pinctrl-msm driver incorrectly
makes use of a non-raw spinlock in it's irq_chip handling. You happened
to hit this warning when there was contention on the lock from hardirq
context.
Can you give the following patch a try? Even though this problem is
only observable on -rt kernels, the below patch is suitable for
inclusion in mainline. (The below is ontop of -next, you may have to
finnagle it a bit to work on the linaro frankenkernel).
Julia
-- 8< --
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Use raw spinlock variants
The MSM pinctrl driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling
GPIO interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary
for the irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a
a real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping"
spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips.
A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only
minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw
spinlock.
On real-time kernels, this fixes an OOPs which looks like the following,
as reported by Brian Wrenn:
kernel BUG at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1014!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: spidev_irq(O) smsc75xx wcn36xx [last unloaded: spidev]
CPU: 0 PID: 1163 Comm: irq/144-mmc0 Tainted: G W O 4.4.9-linaro-lt-qcom #1
PC is at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x80/0x2d8
LR is at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x68/0x2d8
[..]
Call trace:
rt_spin_lock_slowlock
rt_spin_lock
msm_gpio_irq_ack
handle_edge_irq
generic_handle_irq
msm_gpio_irq_handler
generic_handle_irq
__handle_domain_irq
gic_handle_irq
Reported-by: Brian Wrenn <dcbrianw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
index 775c883..f8e9e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct msm_pinctrl {
struct notifier_block restart_nb;
int irq;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
DECLARE_BITMAP(dual_edge_irqs, MAX_NR_GPIO);
DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled_irqs, MAX_NR_GPIO);
@@ -153,14 +153,14 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
if (WARN_ON(i == g->nfuncs))
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
val &= ~mask;
val |= i << g->mux_bit;
writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -323,14 +323,14 @@ static int msm_config_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
break;
case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
/* set output value */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->io_reg);
if (arg)
val |= BIT(g->out_bit);
else
val &= ~BIT(g->out_bit);
writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->io_reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
/* enable output */
arg = 1;
@@ -351,12 +351,12 @@ static int msm_config_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
val &= ~(mask << bit);
val |= arg << bit;
writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
}
return 0;
@@ -384,13 +384,13 @@ static int msm_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
val &= ~BIT(g->oe_bit);
writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, in
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->io_reg);
if (value)
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, in
val |= BIT(g->oe_bit);
writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->ctl_reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->io_reg);
if (value)
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
val &= ~BIT(g->out_bit);
writel(val, pctrl->regs + g->io_reg);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->intr_cfg_reg);
val &= ~BIT(g->intr_enable_bit);
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
clear_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->enabled_irqs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
}
static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->intr_status_reg);
val &= ~BIT(g->intr_status_bit);
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
set_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->enabled_irqs);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
}
static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
val = readl(pctrl->regs + g->intr_status_reg);
if (g->intr_ack_high)
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
if (test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->dual_edge_irqs))
msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_pos(pctrl, g, d);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
}
static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
/*
* For hw without possibility of detecting both edges
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
if (test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->dual_edge_irqs))
msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_pos(pctrl, g, d);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
@@ -732,11 +732,11 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ int msm_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
pctrl->soc = soc_data;
pctrl->chip = msm_gpio_template;
- spin_lock_init(&pctrl->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&pctrl->lock);
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
pctrl->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
--
2.10.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
