On 12/1/2016 11:38 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
On 11/29/2016 05:40 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
Hi Georgi,
On 11/28/2016 11:09 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
On apq8016, apq8084 and apq8074 platforms, writing to the software
reset register triggers the "power irq". We need to ack and handle
the irq, otherwise the following message appears:
mmc0: Reset 0x1 never completed.
sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)===========
sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00002e02
sdhci: Blk size: 0x00004000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
sdhci: Present: 0x01f80000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
sdhci: Power: 0x00000000 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000003
sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
sdhci: Caps: 0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x00008007
sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000000000000
sdhci: ===========================================
Fix it by implementing the custom sdhci_reset() function,
which performs the software reset and then handles the irq.
Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1: (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/22/411)
* Perform the software reset by just writing to the
SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET
register and then check for the irq.
I am still not sure about this change. Below change will trigger the
IRQ, once this call is completed (say on a single core system) -since
this is called while holding spin_lock_irqsave.
But you will be end up calling sdhci_msm_voltage_switch twice,
which to me does not seems correct.
1. 1st time you are directly calling it in sdhci_msm_reset.
2. 2nd time will be called from within pwr_irq to handle the same case.
Yes, that would be the behavior. This function actually is not doing
anything much than to check irq status and ack it. Testing the patch
Ok.
on a few different platforms does not show any side effects, however i
could not be 100% sure as i have limited information about the hardware.
what about the case when say the IRQ is delayed because of some other
overheads in the system. Will this approach still works?
I understand this would require some HW knowledge to understand the
functioning/importance of this pwr_irq. I will try and get in touch with
HW folk here.
Regards
Ritesh
Thanks,
Georgi
Please let me know your thoughts on this ?
Regards
Ritesh
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index 32879b845b75..157ae07f9309 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -1019,6 +1019,33 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct
sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
__sdhci_msm_set_clock(host, clock);
}
+void sdhci_msm_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
+{
+ unsigned long timeout = 100;
+
+ sdhci_writeb(host, mask, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET);
+
+ if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL) {
+ host->clock = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * SDHCI_RESET_ALL triggers the PWR IRQ and we need
+ * to handle it here.
+ */
+ sdhci_msm_voltage_switch(host);
+ }
+
+ while (sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET) & mask) {
+ if (timeout == 0) {
+ pr_err("%s: Reset 0x%x never completed.\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc), (int)mask);
+ return;
+ }
+ timeout--;
+ mdelay(1);
+ }
+}
+
static const struct of_device_id sdhci_msm_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4" },
{},
@@ -1028,7 +1055,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_msm_dt_match);
static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_msm_ops = {
.platform_execute_tuning = sdhci_msm_execute_tuning,
- .reset = sdhci_reset,
+ .reset = sdhci_msm_reset,
.set_clock = sdhci_msm_set_clock,
.get_min_clock = sdhci_msm_get_min_clock,
.get_max_clock = sdhci_msm_get_max_clock,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
