On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:12:08PM +0530, Sricharan wrote: [...] > >Cool. We're rather hoping that the ACPI stuff is good to go for 4.10 > >now, so it's probably worth pulling the rest of that in (beyond the one > >patch I picked) to make sure the of_dma_configure/acpi_dma_configure > >paths don't inadvertently diverge. > > > > I rebased and was testing your branch with Lorenzo's series. One thing > i am still trying to get right is the acpi_dma_configure call. With your > series dma_configure calls pci_dma/of_dma configure, so i am just adding > acpi_dma_configure call there for non-pci ACPI devices as well. I see that > acpi_dma_configure right now is called from acpi_bind_one and > iort_add_smmu_platform_device, both go through the really_probe function > path, so moving acpi_dma_configure from the above the two functions > to dma_configure. I remember we discussed this on another thread, so > hopefully it is correct. I do not have an platform to test the ACPI though. > I will take some testing help on V4 for this. I am happy to test it for you please just send me a pointer at your v4 code. Thank you ! Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
