Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add sdhci_reset() implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Georgi,

I collected some info on this problem. May be below info might help you.


I think "Reset 0x1" problem is occurring because of below call stack.
SDHCI_RESET_ALL to SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET register will anyway trigger the sdhci_msm_pwr_irq.

But I think the problem is that the above occurs in spinlock context
and because of only one core the IRQ will never be serviced, hence you were seeing (Reset 0x1) error.


[ 12.583245] systemd-journald[1236]: Received SIGTERM from PID 1 (systemd-shutdow).
[   12.673684] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p10): re-mounted. Opts: data=ordered
[   12.678224] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p10): re-mounted. Opts: data=ordered
[   13.698330] mmc0: Reset 0x1 never completed.
[   13.698353] sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)===========
[   13.701659] sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version:  0x00002e02
[   13.707301] sdhci: Blk size: 0x00004000 | Blk cnt:  0x00000000
[   13.713117] sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
[   13.718933] sdhci: Present:  0x01f80000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
[   13.724750] sdhci: Power:    0x00000000 | Blk gap:  0x00000000
[   13.730564] sdhci: Wake-up:  0x00000000 | Clock:    0x00000003
[   13.736381] sdhci: Timeout:  0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
[   13.742197] sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
[   13.748012] sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
[   13.753830] sdhci: Caps:     0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1:   0x00008007
[   13.759644] sdhci: Cmd:      0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
[   13.765461] sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
[   13.771275] sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000000000000
[   13.775357] sdhci: ===========================================
[ 13.781698] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 4.9.0-rc5-00222-g59ac3c0-dirty #9
[   13.787514] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. APQ 8016 SBC (DT)
[   13.796104] Call trace:
[   13.802878] [<ffff0000080882c4>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a8
[   13.805049] [<ffff000008088480>] show_stack+0x14/0x1c
[   13.810602] [<ffff000008366274>] dump_stack+0x8c/0xb0
[   13.815640] [<ffff00000870eab0>] sdhci_reset+0xd8/0x114
[   13.820670] [<ffff00000870ee30>] sdhci_do_reset+0x48/0x7c
[   13.825706] [<ffff00000870ef20>] sdhci_init+0xbc/0x110
[   13.831260] [<ffff000008710c44>] sdhci_set_ios+0x68/0x59c
[   13.836299] [<ffff0000086f95f4>] mmc_set_initial_state+0xc0/0xcc
[   13.841767] [<ffff0000086f983c>] mmc_power_off.part.22+0x28/0x40
[   13.847841] [<ffff0000086f9b5c>] mmc_power_off+0x14/0x1c
[   13.853832] [<ffff0000086fc754>] _mmc_suspend+0x1e4/0x260
[   13.859127] [<ffff0000086fe104>] mmc_shutdown+0x2c/0x60
[   13.864421] [<ffff0000086faa00>] mmc_bus_shutdown+0x40/0x74
[   13.869458] [<ffff0000084f9280>] device_shutdown+0xf0/0x1a8
[   13.875013] [<ffff0000080db908>] kernel_restart_prepare+0x34/0x3c
[   13.880568] [<ffff0000080db9e4>] kernel_restart+0x14/0x74
[   13.886817] [<ffff0000080dbd2c>] SyS_reboot+0x178/0x244
[   13.892198] [<ffff000008082ef0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[   13.897300] mmc0: sdhci_msm_pwr_irq:
[   13.902799] mmc0: sdhci_msm_voltage_switch: irq_status 9
[   13.906355] mmc0: sdhci_msm_voltage_switch: irq_status 9, irq_ack 5


To prove above I tried this and the problem goes away. But I still dont think that the below approach is correct. As it will still trigger a pwr_irq as well.


diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 62aedf1..01e611c 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
                /* Reset-all turns off SD Bus Power */
                if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_CARD_ON_NEEDS_BUS_ON)
                        sdhci_runtime_pm_bus_off(host);
+               if (host->ops->voltage_switch)
+                       host->ops->voltage_switch(host);
        }

        /* Wait max 100 ms */



On 11/22/2016 9:20 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
On apq8016, apq8084 and apq8074 platforms, when we want to do a
software reset, we need to poke some additional vendor specific
registers. If we don't do so, the following error message appears:

mmc0: Reset 0x1 never completed.
sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)===========
sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version:  0x00002e02
sdhci: Blk size: 0x00004000 | Blk cnt:  0x00000000
sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
sdhci: Present:  0x01f80000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
sdhci: Power:    0x00000000 | Blk gap:  0x00000000
sdhci: Wake-up:  0x00000000 | Clock:    0x00000003
sdhci: Timeout:  0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
sdhci: Caps:     0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1:   0x00008007
sdhci: Cmd:      0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000000000000
sdhci: ===========================================

Fix it by implementing the custom sdhci_reset() function,
which does what is needed.

Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index 8ef44a2a2fd9..87a124a37408 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -505,6 +505,23 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }

+void sdhci_msm_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
+{
+	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+	struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+
+	if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL) {
+		u32 val = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_POWER);
+
+		val |= CORE_SW_RST;
+		writel_relaxed(val, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_POWER);
Not required as sdhci_reset register should anyway reset and trigger a pwr_irq. Because you are not servicing that IRQ the problem is present.

+
+		sdhci_msm_voltage_switch(host);
+	}
+
+	sdhci_reset(host, mask);
This I think is sufficient.

+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id sdhci_msm_dt_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4" },
 	{},
@@ -514,7 +531,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_msm_dt_match);

 static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_msm_ops = {
 	.platform_execute_tuning = sdhci_msm_execute_tuning,
-	.reset = sdhci_reset,
+	.reset = sdhci_msm_reset,
 	.set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
 	.set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
 	.set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux