On 11/16, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote: > This is patchset v4 having modifications as per comment on patchset v3. > Major changes w.r.t. patchset v3 are as below. > 1- clean up of resource struct initialization. > 2- breaking up all changes into more number of logical patches. > 3- handling of clock through array of clock pointers. > 4- single place handling of proxy and active regulators. > 5- Addressing Other comments on last patches. > > There were certain comments which could not be addressed > 1- To program MSS_RESET via GCC reset controller > Since MSS_RESET does not control any clock as are done by other BCR or block control > registers, so it does not qualify to be controlled by GCC reset controller. > This is moreover like any other register, which can be programmed by IOREMAP. Sorry I don't understand this reasoning at all. If MSS_RESET lives in GCC, then it should be exposed as a reset through the linux kernel reset APIs. It doesn't matter if that reset controls or doesn't control a clock in the hardware implementation. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
