Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:
> @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
>  static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_scm *scm;
> +	uint64_t clks;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!scm)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> -	if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
> -		if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -			return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
> +	clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) {
> +		scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> +		if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) {
> +			if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk);
>  
> -		scm->core_clk = NULL;
> +			scm->core_clk = NULL;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) {

Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer
we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device
data to figure out what quirks to apply.

> -		scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iface");
> -		if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) {
> -			if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER)

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux