On 11/01/2016 10:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/31/2016 05:05 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> On Tue 25 Oct 13:57 PDT 2016, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: >>> >>>> Add xo clock support required to boot up Qualcomm ADSP processor. >>>> The ADSP remoteproc driver keeps xo clock enabled until the >>>> driver receives "handover" irq, in order to allow ADSP processor >>>> to vote for xo clock with rpm. >>> Looks good, thanks. >>> >>> We have to add the clock to the DT binding and run that by Rob again, >>> before merging the driver and this patch. >>> >> Maybe we should make the xo clock required. We always have a clock for >> it somewhere, either RPM controlled or as a fixed rate clock so it >> should work just as well. >> > As far as I can see it is required, after Sarangdhar's patch - so this > is what I meant we need to add to the DT binding before merging that. > And as you say, we can always make it reference "xo_board" for now. > Ah good then. Brain must have misread the patch. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
