RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] IOMMU probe deferral support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marek,

>>>> Initial post from Laurent Pinchart[1]. This is
>>>> series calls the dma ops configuration for the devices
>>>> at a generic place so that it works for all busses.
>>>> The dma_configure_ops for a device is now called during
>>>> the device_attach callback just before the probe of the
>>>> bus/driver is called. Similarly dma_deconfigure is called during
>>>> device/driver_detach path.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pci_bus_add_devices    (platform/amba)(_device_create/driver_register)
>>>>          |                         |
>>>> pci_bus_add_device     (device_add/driver_register)
>>>>          |                         |
>>>> device_attach           device_initial_probe
>>>>          |                         |
>>>> __device_attach_driver    __device_attach_driver
>>>>          |
>>>> driver_probe_device
>>>>          |
>>>> really_probe
>>>>          |
>>>> dma_configure
>>>>
>>>>    Similarly on the device/driver_unregister path __device_release_driver is
>>>>    called which inturn calls dma_deconfigure.
>>>>
>>>>    If the ACPI bus code follows the same, we can add acpi_dma_configure
>>>>    at the same place as of_dma_configure.
>>>>
>>>>    This series is based on the recently merged Generic DT bindings for
>>>>    PCI IOMMUs and ARM SMMU from Robin Murphy robin.murphy@xxxxxxx [2]
>>>>
>>>>    This time tested this with platform and pci device for probe deferral
>>>>    and reprobe on arm64 based platform. There is an issue on the cleanup
>>>>    path for arm64 though, where there is WARN_ON if the dma_ops is reset while
>>>>    device is attached to an domain in arch_teardown_dma_ops.
>>>>    But with iommu_groups created from the iommu driver, the device is always
>>>>    attached to a domain/default_domain. So so the WARN has to be removed/handled
>>>>    probably.
>>> Thanks for continuing work on this feature! Your can add my:
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>    Thanks for testing this. So the for the below fix, the remove_device callback
>>    gets called on the dma_ops cleanup path, so would it be easy to remove the
>>    data for the device there ?
>
>I assumed that IOMMU driver cannot be removed reliably, so all
>structures that it
>creates are permanent. I didn't use device_add()/device_remove()
>callbacks, because
>in current implementation device_add() is called too late (after
>dma-mapping glue
>triggers device_attach_iommu()).
>
>Maybe once your patchset is merged, I will move creation and management
>of the all
>IOMMU related structures to device_add/remove callbacks.
>
    ok understand it.

Regards,
Sricharan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux