On 10/20/2016 5:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
>> > void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
>> > {
>> > if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
>> > - acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
>> > + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
> This looks slightly odd. What about
>
> + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=
>
>> > (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
>> > }
Makes sense.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
