On 10/20/2016 7:41 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:01:04PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> On 10/19/2016 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >>> - Maintain a mapping of (IRQ, penalty). Initially all penalties are >>> zero. This is for *all* IRQs, not just ISA ones. This could be a >>> linked list, but the structure is not important as long as we can >>> add things dynamically. >> >> Dynamic allocation doesn't work due to early calls from x86 architecture. >> This is the reason why we iterate the link objects. > > Where exactly is this early penalization? That seems to be the > biggest problem. Well, maybe the question of ACPI core parsing of > _CRS/_PRS is a bigger structural problem, but the dynamic allocation > thing at least seems solvable. > http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=145580159209240&w=2 -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
