On 10/19/2016 6:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> -static int hidma_create_sysfs_entry(struct hidma_dev *dev, char *name,
>> > - int mode)
>> > +static int hidma_sysfs_uninit(struct hidma_dev *dev)
>> > +{
>> > + if (!dev->chid_attrs)
>> > + return -ENOMEM;
> why is this check required? Probe would fail in init case right.
> Second returning error doesnt help as you are calling this from remove and
> return is not checked so redundant!
Agreed, I'll get rid of the attrs and also the return value.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
