On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:21:59PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 08 Sep 10:35 PDT 2016, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> > > >>> The wcn36xx wifi driver follows the life cycle of the WLAN_CTRL SMD > > >>> channel, as such it should be a SMD client. This patch makes this > > >>> transition, now that we have the necessary frameworks available. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> --- > > >>> > > >>> Changes since v3: > > >>> - Made msg_header const in wcn36xx_smd_rsp_process() > > >>> > > >>> Changes since v2: > > >>> - Correct the call to the new ieee80211_scan_completed() > > >>> > > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/dxe.c | 16 +++--- > > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c | 31 +++++------- > > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.h | 5 ++ > > >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/wcn36xx.h | 21 +++----- > > >>> 5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> This doesn't compile for me: > > >> > > > > > > I thought I mentioned this in the mail, sorry for missing that. > > > > Maybe you did and I just forgot, I have a tendency to do that :) > > > > > There is a patch for this issue in linux-next already [1] which is > > > part of [2], which was part of the pull request to arm-soc for > > > inclusion in v4.9. > > > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9272457/ > > > [2] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git/tag/?h=qcom-drivers-for-4.9 > > > > So the commit in question is: > > > > soc: qcom: smd: Correct compile stub prototypes > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git/commit/?h=qcom-drivers-for-4.9&id=3a1281848830fcb3202cfd7ffe62d19641471d05 > > > > Correct > > > But that's not obviously in my tree yet, but I should have it after > > 4.9-rc1 is released. I think it's easiest that I wait for that before > > applying these. Do you agree? > > > > Would be nice to have it land sooner rather than later, but I'm okay > with this. We could just treat the tag as immutable. You can merge the tag in and arm-soc can as well. it'll just get nop'd the second time it is taken. The only downside is if arm-soc doesn't take my merge request. Or we can wait till -rc1 Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
