On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:03:29PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:55 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 04:42:39PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 20:43:57 +0530, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote: > > > > This patch series consist of six parts and covers the following: > > > > > > > > 1. Provide option to re-enable context caching to retain prefetcher > > > > settings during reset and runtime suspend. > > > > > > > > 2. Remove cfg inside qcom_smmu structure and replace it with single > > > > pointer to qcom_smmu_match_data avoiding replication of multiple > > > > members from same. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Applied to iommu (arm/smmu/updates), thanks! > > > > > > [1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation > > > https://git.kernel.org/iommu/c/ef4144b1b47d > > > [2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer > > > https://git.kernel.org/iommu/c/445d7a8ed90e > > > [3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for PRR bit setup > > > https://git.kernel.org/iommu/c/7f2ef1bfc758 > > > [4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Introduce ACTLR custom prefetcher settings > > > https://git.kernel.org/iommu/c/9fe18d825a58 > > > [5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add ACTLR data and support for qcom_smmu_500 > > > https://git.kernel.org/iommu/c/3e35c3e725de > > > > Hrm. I'm not seeing any user of the new ->set_prr*_() functions in > > linux-next yet. Is there something under review, or should I revert this > > for now? > > It is WIP, part of a larger patchset adding sparse binding support in > drm/msm. Please do not revert. Sure, if it's actively being worked on then I'll leave the hooks in place. Do you have a link to the patchset so that I can follow along, please? Will
