Hi Ackerley, On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 at 14:23, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Hi Ackerley, > > > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 17:04, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > Before transitioning a guest_memfd folio to unshared, thereby > >> > disallowing access by the host and allowing the hypervisor to > >> > transition its view of the guest page as private, we need to be > >> > sure that the host doesn't have any references to the folio. > >> > > >> > This patch introduces a new type for guest_memfd folios, which > >> > isn't activated in this series but is here as a placeholder and > >> > to facilitate the code in the subsequent patch series. This will > >> > be used in the future to register a callback that informs the > >> > guest_memfd subsystem when the last reference is dropped, > >> > therefore knowing that the host doesn't have any remaining > >> > references. > >> > > >> > This patch also introduces the configuration option, > >> > KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM, which toggles support for mapping > >> > guest_memfd shared memory at the host. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> > >> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++ > >> > include/linux/page-flags.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > >> > mm/debug.c | 1 + > >> > mm/swap.c | 9 +++++++++ > >> > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > >> > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > >> > index f34f4cfaa513..7788e3625f6d 100644 > >> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h > >> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > >> > @@ -2571,4 +2571,11 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > >> > struct kvm_pre_fault_memory *range); > >> > #endif > >> > > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM > >> > +static inline void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio) > >> > +{ > >> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "A placeholder that shouldn't trigger. Work in progress."); > >> > +} > >> > +#endif > >> > + > >> > #endif > >> > >> Following up with the discussion at the guest_memfd biweekly call on the > >> guestmem library, I think this folio_put() handler for guest_memfd could > >> be the first function that's refactored out into (placeholder name) > >> mm/guestmem.c. > >> > >> This folio_put() handler has to stay in memory even after KVM (as a > >> module) is unloaded from memory, and so it is a good candidate for the > >> first function in the guestmem library. > >> > >> Along those lines, CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM in this patch can be > >> renamed CONFIG_GUESTMEM, and CONFIG_GUESTMEM will guard the existence of > >> PGTY_guestmem. > >> > >> CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM can be introduced in the next patch of this > >> series, which could, in Kconfig, select CONFIG_GUESTMEM. > >> > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h > >> > index 6dc2494bd002..daeee9a38e4c 100644 > >> > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h > >> > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h > >> > @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ enum pagetype { > >> > PGTY_slab = 0xf5, > >> > PGTY_zsmalloc = 0xf6, > >> > PGTY_unaccepted = 0xf7, > >> > + PGTY_guestmem = 0xf8, > >> > > >> > PGTY_mapcount_underflow = 0xff > >> > }; > >> > @@ -1082,6 +1083,21 @@ FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(hugetlb, hugetlb) > >> > FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(hugetlb) > >> > #endif > >> > > >> > +/* > >> > + * guestmem folios are used to back VM memory as managed by guest_memfd. Once > >> > + * the last reference is put, instead of freeing these folios back to the page > >> > + * allocator, they are returned to guest_memfd. > >> > + * > >> > + * For now, guestmem will only be set on these folios as long as they cannot be > >> > + * mapped to user space ("private state"), with the plan of always setting that > >> > + * type once typed folios can be mapped to user space cleanly. > >> > + */ > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM > >> > +FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(guestmem, guestmem) > >> > +#else > >> > +FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(guestmem) > >> > +#endif > >> > + > >> > PAGE_TYPE_OPS(Zsmalloc, zsmalloc, zsmalloc) > >> > > >> > /* > >> > diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c > >> > index 8d2acf432385..08bc42c6cba8 100644 > >> > --- a/mm/debug.c > >> > +++ b/mm/debug.c > >> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const char *page_type_names[] = { > >> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(table), > >> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(buddy), > >> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(unaccepted), > >> > + DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(guestmem), > >> > }; > >> > > >> > static const char *page_type_name(unsigned int page_type) > >> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c > >> > index 47bc1bb919cc..241880a46358 100644 > >> > --- a/mm/swap.c > >> > +++ b/mm/swap.c > >> > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ > >> > #include <linux/local_lock.h> > >> > #include <linux/buffer_head.h> > >> > > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM > >> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h> > >> > +#endif > >> > + > >> > #include "internal.h" > >> > > >> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS > >> > @@ -101,6 +105,11 @@ static void free_typed_folio(struct folio *folio) > >> > case PGTY_hugetlb: > >> > free_huge_folio(folio); > >> > return; > >> > +#endif > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM > >> > + case PGTY_guestmem: > >> > + kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(folio); > >> > + return; > >> > #endif > >> > default: > >> > WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > >> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > >> > index 54e959e7d68f..37f7734cb10f 100644 > >> > --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig > >> > +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > >> > @@ -124,3 +124,8 @@ config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_PREPARE > >> > config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_INVALIDATE > >> > bool > >> > depends on KVM_PRIVATE_MEM > >> > + > >> > +config KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM > >> > + select KVM_PRIVATE_MEM > >> > + depends on !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES > >> > >> Enforcing that KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES is not selected should not > >> be a strict requirement. Fuad explained in an offline chat that this is > >> just temporary. > >> > >> If we have CONFIG_GUESTMEM, then this question is moot, I think > >> CONFIG_GUESTMEM would just be independent of everything else; other > >> configs would depend on CONFIG_GUESTMEM. > > > > There are two things here. First of all, the unfortunate naming > > situation where PRIVATE could mean GUESTMEM, or private could mean not > > shared. I plan to tackle this aspect (i.e., the naming) in a separate > > patch series, since that will surely generate a lot of debate :) > > > > Oops. By "depend on CONFIG_GUESTMEM" I meant "depend on the introduction > of the guestmem shim". I think this is a good time to introduce the shim > because the folio_put() callback needs to be in mm and not just in KVM, > which is a loadable module and hence can be removed from memory. > > If we do introduce the shim, the config flag CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM > will be replaced by CONFIG_GUESTMEM (or other name), and then the > question on depending on !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES will be moot > since I think an mm config flag wouldn't place a constraint on a module > config flag? I see. > When I wrote this, I thought that config flags are easily renamed since > they're an interface and are user-facing, but I realized config flag > renaming seems to be easily renamed based on this search [1]. > > If we're going with renaming in a separate patch series, some mechanism > should be introduced here to handle the case where I'm not talking about renaming the contents of _this_ patch series. I was referring to existing tems such as, CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM, which really enabled guestmemfd. > 1. Kernel (and KVM module) is compiled with KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM set > 2. KVM is unloaded > 3. folio_put() tries to call kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put() > > > The other part is that, with shared memory in-place, the memory > > attributes are an orthogonal matter. The attributes are the userpace's > > view of what it expects the state of the memory to be, and are used to > > multiplex whether the memory being accessed is guest_memfd or the > > regular (i.e., most likely anonymous) memory used normally by KVM. > > > > This behavior however would be architecture, or even vm-type specific. > > > > I agree it is orthogonal but I'm calling this out because "depends on > !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES" means if I set > CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, I can't use PGTY_guestmem since > CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM would get unset. I'll remove this dependence in the respin. Thanks, /fiad > I was trying to test this with a KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM, setting up for > using the ioctl to convert memory and hit this issue. > > > Cheers, > > /fuad > > > >> > + bool > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=s%3Arename+dfn%3AKconfig+merged