Hello Krzysztof, On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:07:42AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/03/2025 00:33, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > So summarizing we have: Iff you use --base with a non-public commit, it's > > Which is easily visible that it was not the case here. No human used > format-patch thus no human used --base. The human used b4 which used git format-patch --base (or something equivalent). It really doesn't matter that it was only used indirectly, my statement is true nevertheless. > > useless and irrelevant. I fully agree. Our conclusion is different > > though. You accept it's useless (and even request from me that I do the > > same), and I asked the submitter to use --base as intended to make the > > resulting information usable. > > Because you expect additional steps for users of b4 and pointing in > review standard use of b4 is extremely nitpicking. My request makes the difference between having build bot coverage and not having it. I consider that something important so I don't agree this to be nitpicking. Looking at https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=prerequisite-patch-id+change-id it also doesn't seem soo unusual that people using b4 go through these additional steps. But I can hold out if you don't consider the result of patch checkers relevant. That's why I intend to stop participating in this discussion now. Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
