On 05/03/2025 17:59, George Moussalem wrote: >> On 05/03/2025 14:41, George Moussalem wrote: >>> From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Not correct From. Cover letter should be written by you. > Noted. I thought I'd keep the original author included and added my v3 changes which you rightfully pointed out should have been v4 instead. > Will remove in next version. >> >>> This patch series adds the relevant phy and controller >>> DT configurations for enabling PCI gen2 support >>> on IPQ5018. IPQ5018 has two phys and two controllers, >>> one dual-lane and one single-lane. >>> >>> Last patch series (v2) submitted dates back to August 27, 2024. >>> As I've worked to add IPQ5018 platform support in OpenWrt, I'm >>> continuing the efforts to add Linux kernel support. >>> >>> v3: >>> *) Depends on: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20250220094251.230936-1-quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx/ >> >> Wasn't this applied, so why is it still a dependency? > I explicitly added it as ipq5332 has not made it to the master branch yet. Should I remove? If you treat something not yet released as dependency, then please stop sending so many versions because nothing here can be applied for this cycle. Why is this a dependency? Best regards, Krzysztof
