On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:06:52AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 06:19:53PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 05:12:20PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > > On 04/03/2025 17:04, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately, this series still regresses Pulseaudio as capture is now > > > > choppy (e.g. when recording using parecord). > > > > > > > > During our off-list debugging sessions you suggested reducing the max > > > > capture period size (that this series increases) to 6144 (same as min) > > > > and that fixed the Pulseaudio capture issue. In v3 the, the max period > > > > is again increased to 65536 which appears to break Pulseaudio capture. > > > > > > I have verified pulseaudio on my side as well, the 64 byte alignment > > > should have fixed the issue on the pulseaudio side. > > > > > > Did you pick up the [PATCH v3 4/6] ASoC: qdsp6: q6apm-dai: set correct > > > period and buffer alignment. patch in your tests? > > > > Yes, I'm running with the full series applied. I tested PA on the X13s > > (and PW on the T14s). > > I just tested PA on the T14s and it has the same problem with > choppy recording with this series applied. > > As with the (amended) v2, setting the max capture period size to 6144 > appears to make the problem go away. Actually, there may still be some distortion also with the max period size capped at 6144 with PA (there's a hint of it breaking up as with the non-modified v3). At least the PW recording sounded cleaner, even if I guess there could be other causes for this. Johan
