On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:01:40AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:56:00PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:24:24 +0200 > > > > The address of a data structure member was determined before > > a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of > > the functions “dpu_hw_pp_enable_te” and “dpu_hw_pp_get_vsync_info”. > > > > Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by removing extra > > initialisations for the variable “c” (also because it was already > > reassigned with the same value behind this pointer check). There is no undefined behavior here. > > > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Please don't send resends and/or new iterations in response to your > previous patchsets. Otherwise they have a pretty high chance to be > ignored by the maintainers. Use a fresh git-send-email command to send > new patchset. > > > > > Fixes: 25fdd5933e4c ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support") Remove the Fixes tag. This patch is fine as a clean up. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> regards, dan carpenter