Hi Lina, [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160825] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Lina-Iyer/PM-SoC-idle-support-using-PM-domains/20160827-042847 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next config: m68k-sun3_defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=m68k All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/proc/stat.c:13:0: include/linux/tick.h: In function 'tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup': >> include/linux/tick.h:138:9: error: 'tick_next_period' undeclared (first use in this function) return tick_next_period; ^ include/linux/tick.h:138:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in vim +/tick_next_period +138 include/linux/tick.h 132 133 return len; 134 } 135 136 static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu) 137 { > 138 return tick_next_period; 139 } 140 141 static inline u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; } --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
