Re: [PATCH v7 13/15] drm/msm/dpu: support SSPP assignment for quad-pipe case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> 于2025年2月27日周四 02:10写道:
>
>
>
> On 2/26/2025 4:31 AM, Jun Nie wrote:
> > Currently, SSPPs are assigned to a maximum of two pipes. However,
> > quad-pipe usage scenarios require four pipes and involve configuring
> > two stages. In quad-pipe case, the first two pipes share a set of
> > mixer configurations and enable multi-rect mode when certain
> > conditions are met. The same applies to the subsequent two pipes.
> >
> > Assign SSPPs to the pipes in each stage using a unified method and
> > to loop the stages accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c  | 11 +++++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h  |  2 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >   3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> > index 0a053c5888262d863a1e549e14e3aa40a80c3f06..9405453cbf5d852e72a5f954cd8c6aed3a222723 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> > @@ -1366,6 +1366,17 @@ int dpu_crtc_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool en)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * dpu_crtc_get_num_lm - Get mixer number in this CRTC pipeline
> > + * @state: Pointer to drm crtc state object
> > + */
> > +unsigned int dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(const struct drm_crtc_state *state)
> > +{
> > +     struct dpu_crtc_state *cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(state);
> > +
> > +     return cstate->num_mixers;
> > +}
> > +
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> >   static int _dpu_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> >   {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> > index 0b148f3ce0d7af80ec4ffcd31d8632a5815b16f1..b14bab2754635953da402d09e11a43b9b4cf4153 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> > @@ -264,4 +264,6 @@ static inline enum dpu_crtc_client_type dpu_crtc_get_client_type(
> >
> >   void dpu_crtc_frame_event_cb(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u32 event);
> >
> > +unsigned int dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(const struct drm_crtc_state *state);
> > +
> >   #endif /* _DPU_CRTC_H_ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > index d67f2ad20b4754ca4bcb759a65a39628b7236b0f..d1d6c91ed0f8e1c62b757ca42546fbc421609f72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> > @@ -1112,11 +1112,10 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >       struct dpu_rm_sspp_requirements reqs;
> >       struct dpu_plane_state *pstate;
> >       struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
> > -     struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe;
> >       struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
> > -     struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
> > +     struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
> >       const struct msm_format *fmt;
> > -     int i;
> > +     int i, num_lm, stage_id, num_stages;
> >
> >       if (plane_state->crtc)
> >               crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> > @@ -1124,11 +1123,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >
> >       pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(plane_state);
> >
> > -     pipe = &pstate->pipe[0];
> > -     r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[1];
> > -     pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
> > -     r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
> > -
> >       for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_PLANE; i++)
> >               pstate->pipe[i].sspp = NULL;
> >
> > @@ -1142,24 +1136,49 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >
> >       reqs.rot90 = drm_rotation_90_or_270(plane_state->rotation);
> >
> > -     pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_reserve_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state, crtc, &reqs);
> > -     if (!pipe->sspp)
> > -             return -ENODEV;
> > -
> > -     if (!dpu_plane_try_multirect_parallel(pipe, pipe_cfg, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg,
> > -                                           pipe->sspp,
> > -                                           msm_framebuffer_format(plane_state->fb),
> > -                                           dpu_kms->catalog->caps->max_linewidth)) {
> > -             /* multirect is not possible, use two SSPP blocks */
> > -             r_pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_reserve_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state, crtc, &reqs);
> > -             if (!r_pipe->sspp)
> > -                     return -ENODEV;
> > -
> > -             pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > -             pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > -
> > -             r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> > -             r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> > +     num_lm = dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(crtc_state);
>
> Hi Jun,
>
> Just wondering, why not use dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources() here instead
> of adding a new *_get_num_lm() API?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jessica Zhang
>
It is overkill to loop over allocated resource to just get the number.
That's comments
from Dmitry if I am not wrong.

Regards,
Jun





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux