On 08/11, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > This would be useful in subsequent patches when the .set_rate operation > would need to identify if the PLL is actually enabled > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Hmmm I suspect I never implemented the is_enabled op because that will happen to turn off clks during late init that shouldn't otherwise be disabled because the framework now can see that some PLL is enabled out of the bootloader. Is that happening now? We really should fix the framework to make this not be a problem, mostly by finishing off the clk handoff patches that Mike posted a while back. But either way, I'm worried with these patches that implement is_enabled ops. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
