Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: qup: Vote for interconnect bandwidth to DRAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stephen,

sorry for the very late reply here. Just one question.

...

> downstream/vendor driver [1]. Due to lack of documentation about the
> interconnect setup/behavior I cannot say exactly if this is right.
> Unfortunately, this is not implemented very consistently downstream...

Can we have someone from Qualcomm or Linaro taking a peak here?

> [1]: https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-3.10/-/commit/67174e2624ea64814231e7e1e4af83fd882302c6

...

> @@ -1745,6 +1775,11 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto fail_dma;
>  		}
>  		qup->is_dma = true;
> +
> +		qup->icc_path = devm_of_icc_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(qup->icc_path))
> +			return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(qup->icc_path),
> +					     "failed to get interconnect path\n");

Can we live without it if it fails?

Thanks,
Andi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux