On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 08:06:40PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Since these are common to all Desginware PCIe IPs, move them to a new
> header, 'pcie-dwc.h' so that other drivers could make use of them.
Which drivers are going to use it? Please provide an explanation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 23 ++---------------------
> include/linux/pcie-dwc.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 896a307fa065..b4d09d52a750 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -18123,6 +18123,7 @@ S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml
> F: drivers/pci/controller/dwc/*designware*
> +F: include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
>
> PCI DRIVER FOR TI DRA7XX/J721E
> M: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> index cccecae9823f..05b37ea7cf16 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/pcie-dwc.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -99,26 +100,6 @@ struct dwc_pcie_dev_info {
> struct list_head dev_node;
> };
>
> -struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id {
> - u16 vendor_id;
> - u16 vsec_id;
> - u8 vsec_rev;
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * VSEC IDs are allocated by the vendor, so a given ID may mean different
> - * things to different vendors. See PCIe r6.0, sec 7.9.5.2.
> - */
> -static const struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_ids[] = {
> - { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ALIBABA,
> - .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> - { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMPERE,
> - .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> - { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM,
> - .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> - {} /* terminator */
> -};
> -
> static ssize_t cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> @@ -529,7 +510,7 @@ static void dwc_pcie_unregister_pmu(void *data)
>
> static u16 dwc_pcie_des_cap(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> - const struct dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_id *vid;
> + const struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id *vid;
> u16 vsec;
> u32 val;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h b/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..261ae11d75a4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/pcie-dwc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 Alibaba Inc.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2025 Linaro Ltd.
> + * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H
> +#define LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H
> +
> +#include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> +
> +struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id {
> + u16 vendor_id;
> + u16 vsec_id;
> + u8 vsec_rev;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * VSEC IDs are allocated by the vendor, so a given ID may mean different
> + * things to different vendors. See PCIe r6.0, sec 7.9.5.2.
> + */
> +static const struct dwc_pcie_vsec_id dwc_pcie_pmu_vsec_ids[] = {
Having it in the header means that there are going to be several
copies of this data. Is that expected?
> + { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ALIBABA,
> + .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> + { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMPERE,
> + .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> + { .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM,
> + .vsec_id = 0x02, .vsec_rev = 0x4 },
> + {} /* terminator */
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* LINUX_PCIE_DWC_H */
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
